Home / AFT Cases Appealed in High Court / Supreme Court
No. | Case No. | Case Title | Order Date | Bench | Subject | Court Name | Judgement Type | Document | Remark |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | CWP 17998/2024 | UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Vs. NO. 4187527W EX. HAV. SUNIL KUMAR AND ANOTHER | 2022-10-10 | Chandigarh | Petitioners have challenged the judgement of the AFT(RB) Chandigarh wherein respondent was granted disability pension. He incurred disabilities of ‘CAD- STEMI- POST CARDIAC ARREST SURVIVOUR (VENTRICULAR FIBRILLATION- POST CARDIOVERSION) POST PRIMARY PTCA & STENING TO LAD (exicnce expidition 3.5 x 28 MM) NORMAL LV FUNCTION D.O.D:-30.11.2020 | Punjab and Haryana HC | Decided | ------- | ------ |
2 | CWP 17833/2024 | UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Vs. SUB JAGMAL SINGH AND ANOTHER | 2022-08-17 | Chandigarh | Petitioners have challenged the judgement of the AFT(RB) Chandigarh wherein respondent was granted disability pension. He incurred disability of “CAD INFERIOR WALL MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION (IWMI)” D.O.D;-30.1.2010 | Punjab and Haryana HC | Decided | ------- | ------ |
3 | CWP 17032/2024 | Union of India, through the Secretary, Ministry of Defence and ors. Vs. No. 15763755LX Ex. Havildar Krishan and Anr. | 2023-01-05 | Chandigarh | Petitioners have challenged the judgement of the AFT(RB) Chandigarh wherein respondent was granted disability pension. He incurred disabilities I. DM TYPE-2 II. Coronary Artery Disease iii.Primary Hypertension D.O.D:-31.03.2021 | Punjab and Haryana HC | Decided | ------- | ------ |
4 | CWP 16945/2024 | UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Vs. EX RECT SOHAN LAL AND ANOTHER | 2023-05-04 | Chandigarh | Petitioners have challenged the judgement of the AFT(RB) Chandigarh wherein respondent was granted disability pension. He incurred disability of Severe Aplastic Anaemia (Saat) (D.61.3) D.O.D:-04.12.2017. | Punjab and Haryana HC | Decided | ------- | ------ |
5 | CWP 24007/2024 | UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Vs. No. 15399955Y EX HAV ARJUN SINGH AND ANR. | 2022-11-15 | Chandigarh | Petitioners have challenged the judgement of the AFT(RB) Chandigarh wherein respondent was granted disability pension. He incurred the disabilities of (I)primary hypertension with target organ damage(1-10) (II) small congenitally hypo plastic LT kidney (iii) type II diabetes Mellitus D.O.D:-30.04.2020 | Punjab and Haryana HC | Decided | ------- | ------ |
6 | CWP 24408/2024 | UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Vs. No. 14900853 EX HAV JOGINDER SINGH AND ANR. | 2019-12-02 | Chandigarh | Petitioners have challenged the judgement of the AFT(RB) Chandigarh wherein respondent was granted disability pension. He incurred the disability of “primary hypertension” D.O.D:-31.08.2004 | Punjab and Haryana HC | Decided | ------- | ------ |
7 | CWP 8824/2020 | Gurcharan Singh Vs. Union of India and Others | 2018-12-06 | Chandigarh | Petitioners have challenged the judgement of the AFT(RB) Chandigarh wherein Petitioner was granted disability pension for a period of 2 years, and thereon post- reassessment , for life. He incurred the disability of “Neurosis Depressive Reaction” D.O.D:-29.07.1978 | Punjab and Haryana HC | Decided | ------- | ------ |
8 | CWP 594/2024 | Rashem Singh Vs. Union of India and Others | 2019-01-29 | Chandigarh | Petitioner has challenged the judgment of the AFT(RB) Chandigarh wherein Petitioner was granted disability pension, but the benefit of disability pension has been restricted to 25.06.2014 instead of the date of his discharge from service i.e. 10.03.2002. He incurred the disability of “Generalized seizure(345) neurocysticercosis” D.O.D:-10.03.2002 | Punjab and Haryana HC | Decided | ------- | ------ |
9 | CWP 24532/2021 | Kulwinder Singh Vs. Union of India and Others | 2014-10-10 | Chandigarh | Petitioners have challenged the judgement of the AFT(RB) Chandigarh wherein Petitioner was denied the grant of the disability pension. He incurred the disability of Hypermetropia Both eyes and Amblyopia Lt eye D.O.D:-29.02.1996 | Punjab and Haryana HC | Decided | ------- | ------ |
10 | CWP 26076/2022 | JC-183400-Y Ex Sub Maj (Hon Lt) Karan Singh Vs. Union of India and Others | 2021-07-12 | Chandigarh | Petitioners has challenged the judgement of the AFT(RB) Chandigarh wherein Petitioner was granted disability pension but it was restricted to three years prior to the filing of the OA He incurred the disability of “Primary Hypertension” D.O.D:-31.12.1997 | Punjab and Haryana HC | Decided | ------- | ------ |