Home / AFT Cases Appealed in High Court / Supreme Court
| No. | Case No. | Case Title | Order Date | Bench | Subject | Court Name | Judgement Type | Document | Remark |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CWP 5473/2024 | Union Of India And Ors. Vs Jc 353085 F, Ex. Nb Sub Balbir Singh | 2022-04-27 | Chandigarh | Petitioners has challenged the judgement of the AFT(RB) Chandigarh wherein respondent was granted disability pension. He incurred the disability of ‘Severe Depressive Episode (F.32.2)’ D.O.D:-31.12.2017 | Punjab and Haryana HC | Decided | ------- | ------ |
| 2 | CWP 5425/2024 | Union Of India And Ors. Vs. Pardeep Kumar @ Pradeep Kumar No. Sc 00147 | 2022-07-27 | Chandigarh | Petitioners has challenged the judgement of the AFT(RB) Chandigarh wherein respondent was granted disability pension. He incurred the disabilities of i. Primary Hypertension (30%) ii. Type-II Diabetes Mellitus (20%) iii. Dyslipidemia iv. Simple Obesity (5%) D.O.D:-31.01.2020 | Punjab and Haryana HC | Decided | ------- | ------ |
| 3 | CWP 31912/2024 | Union Of India And Ors. Vs. No 3401250 K. Ex Sep. Nishan Singh And Anr. | 2021-08-09 | Chandigarh | Petitioners has challenged the judgement of the AFT(RB) Chandigarh wherein respondent was granted disability pension. He incurred the disability of ‘TYPE-II DIABETES MELLITUS P2” D.O.D:-30.09.2019 | Punjab and Haryana HC | Decided | ------- | ------ |
| 4 | CWP 31296/2024 | Union Of India And Ors. Vs. No 14601553 W Ek. Lnk. Surinder Singh And Anr. | 2021-08-06 | Chandigarh | Petitioners has challenged the judgement of the AFT(RB) Chandigarh wherein respondent was granted disability pension. D.O.D:- 31.12.2008 | Punjab and Haryana HC | Decided | ------- | ------ |
| 5 | CWP 27471/2024 | Union Of India And Ors. Vs. Jaipal Singh Hooda (Retd.) And Anr. | 2021-04-04 | Chandigarh | Petitioners has challenged the judgement of the AFT(RB) Chandigarh wherein respondent was granted disability pension. He incurred the disability of “ Coronary Artery Disease, Triple Vessel Disease post PCI to RCA (optd) OPCAB x 2 DONE” D.O.R:-28.02.2021 | Punjab and Haryana HC | Decided | ------- | ------ |
| 6 | CWP 25486/2024 | Union Of India And Ors. Vs. Baljit Singh And Anr. | 2022-12-06 | Chandigarh | Petitioners has challenged the judgement of the AFT(RB) Chandigarh wherein respondent was granted disability pension. He incurred the disabilities of “ CAD (STE-AWMI) - DVD PTCA TO LAD, RCA WITH MODERATE LV DYSFUNCTION @50% & TYPE-II DIABETES MELLITUS @10% D.O.D:--30.06.2014 | Punjab and Haryana HC | Decided | ------- | ------ |
| 7 | CWP 25473/2023 | Union Of India And Others Vs. No 675439 B Ex Gst Satvir Dalal & Anr. | 2023-11-21 | Chandigarh | Petitioners has challenged the judgement of the AFT(RB) Chandigarh wherein respondent was granted the benefit of rounding off, thus for computing the disability element vis-a-vis disability pension. D.O.D:- 28.02.2014 | Punjab and Haryana HC | Decided | ------- | ------ |
| 8 | CWP 22709/2024 | Union Of India And Ors. Vs. Sgt Rajesh Jaswal (Retd). And Anr. | 2022-11-09 | Chandigarh | Petitioners has challenged the judgement of the AFT(RB) Chandigarh wherein respondent was granted disability pension. He incurred the disabilities of i. Primary Hypertension (OLD) Z 09.0 (30%) AND ii.Dyslipidemia (old) Z09 (1-5%) D.O.D:- 31.03.2016 | Punjab and Haryana HC | Decided | ------- | ------ |
| 9 | CWP 15525/2024 | Union Of India And Others Vs. No.3978185 Ex. Nk Gurdev Singh And Another | 2019-12-02 | Chandigarh | Petitioners has challenged the judgement of the AFT(RB) Chandigarh wherein respondent was granted disability pension. He incurred the disability of “Primary Hypertension” D.O.D:- 31.03.2018 | Punjab and Haryana HC | Decided | ------- | ------ |
| 10 | CWP 15488/2024 | Union of India and others Vs. Smt. Chalti widow of No.4150606, Ex Sep (Late) Gopi Chand and another. | 2022-09-14 | Chandigarh | Petitioners has challenged the judgement of the AFT(RB) Chandigarh wherein respondent was granted disability pension. Petitioner husband incurred the disability of “Bilateral Immature Senile Cataract ® Eye Effected more than (Lt) Eye “ D.O.D:-30.11.1995 | Punjab and Haryana HC | Decided | ------- | ------ |