Home / AFT Cases Appealed in High Court / Supreme Court
| No. | Case No. | Case Title | Order Date | Bench | Subject | Court Name | Judgement Type | Document | Remark |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CWP 28856/2024 | Union Of India And Ors. Vs. Ex.Wo Krishan Lal And Another | 2022-09-22 | Chandigarh | Petitioners has challenged the judgement of the AFT(RB) Chandigarh wherein respondent was granted service element of the disability pension. He incurred disabilities of “RECURRENT DEPRESSIVE DISORDER AND CORONARY ARTERY CSA II DVD (POST PCI TO LAD/LAX) NORMAL LV FUNCTION (FRESH) D.O.D:-30.04.2016 | Punjab and Haryana HC | Decided | ------- | ------ |
| 2 | CWP 29763/2024 | Union Of India And Ors. Vs. Onkar Chand Ex Naib Subedar And Anr. | 2019-11-25 | Chandigarh | Petitioners has challenged the judgement of the AFT(RB) Chandigarh wherein respondent was granted service element of the disability pension, by condoning the shortfall of one month from the requisite 15 years of qualifying service for earning service pension in the DSC. D.O.D:-30.09.2015 | Punjab and Haryana HC | Decided | ------- | ------ |
| 3 | CWP 23995/2024 | Union Of India And Ors. Vs. No.1551505x, Ex Nk (Ts) Nar Singh Since Deceased Through His Lrs Smt Shinder Kaur And Anr. | 2022-07-18 | Chandigarh | Petitioners has challenged the judgement of the AFT(RB) Chandigarh wherein respondent was granted service element of the disability pension. He incurred the disabilities of 'ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE SYNDROME & PRIMARY HYPERTENSION'. D.O.D:-31.10.2012 | Punjab and Haryana HC | Decided | ------- | ------ |
| 4 | CWP 14739/2024 | Union Of India And Others Vs. Ex. Sub Param Singh And Another | 2019-03-19 | Chandigarh | Petitioners has challenged the judgement of the AFT(RB) Chandigarh wherein respondent was granted disability pension. He incurred disability of ‘CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE (ANTERIOR WALL MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION)’ D.O.D:- 31.10.2012 | Punjab and Haryana HC | Decided | ------- | ------ |
| 5 | CWP 31639/2024 | Union Of India And Others Vs. Ex. Rfn Jai Lal & Anr | 2018-10-10 | Chandigarh | Petitioner has challenged the judgment of the AFT(RB) Chandigarh whereby Respondent was granted the benefit of rounding off, for the computation of the disability element vis-a-vis disability pension D.O.D:-28.02.1983 | Punjab and Haryana HC | Decided | ------- | ------ |
| 6 | CWP 28838/2024 | Union Of India And Others Vs. Ex. Hav Baljinder Singh & Anr | 2021-07-26 | Chandigarh | Petitioners has challenged the judgement of the AFT(RB) Chandigarh wherein respondent was granted disability pension. He incurred the disabilities of i. Primary Hypertension ii. Obesity iii. Dypsplidemina and iv.Supero Temporal Brva @ Eye Crvo (left) D.O.D:-31.12.2016 | Punjab and Haryana HC | Decided | ------- | ------ |
| 7 | CWP 23961/2024 | Union Of India And Others Vs. Ex. Mwo Jharmal Singh & Anr | 2023-08-07 | Chandigarh | Petitioner has challenged the judgment of the AFT(RB) Chandigarh whereby Respondent was granted the benefit of rounding off, for the computation of the disability element vis-a-vis disability pension D.O.D:-31.01.2003 | Punjab and Haryana HC | Decided | ------- | ------ |
| 8 | CWP 16169/2024 | Union of India and Others Vs. Ex. Naik Baldev Prasad & Anr | 2021-07-12 | Chandigarh | Petitioners has challenged the judgement of the AFT(RB) Chandigarh wherein respondent was granted disability pension. He incurred the disabilities of “ CAD AWMI P/PCI to LAD” D.O.D:-31.05.2019 | Punjab and Haryana HC | Decided | ------- | ------ |
| 9 | CWP 15788/2024 | Union Of India And Ors. Vs. Tejinder Singh And Another | 2023-02-03 | Chandigarh | Petitioners has challenged the judgement of the AFT(RB) Chandigarh wherein respondent was granted disability pension. He incurred the disabilities of i. Obesity (ICD-E66.90(1-5%), ii. DYSLIPIDEMIA (ICD-E78.5) (1-5%) AND iii. HYPERTENSION (ICD-110 30%) D.O.D:-31.08.2020 | Punjab and Haryana HC | Decided | ------- | ------ |
| 10 | CWP 15779/2024 | Union Of India And Ors. Vs. Bachittar Ram And Anr. | 2022-07-05 | Chandigarh | Petitioners has challenged the judgement of the AFT(RB) Chandigarh wherein respondent was granted disability pension. He incurred the disability of “Diabetes Mellitus (NIDDM)” D.O.D:-31.03.2005 | Punjab and Haryana HC | Decided | ------- | ------ |